Live Site
Considered, credible websites for firms and solo practitioners. Built to present your practice with the authority it has earned — and to convert the searches that turn into real matters.
Sites built for practices where the first impression is the whole pitch.
Live Site
Live Site
Concept
Concept
Concept
ConceptProspective clients judge a firm in seconds. Practice areas, credentials, and results, presented with the restraint the profession expects.
A clear, discreet path to a first consultation on every page — because a nervous client will not go looking for your contact page.
Most legal searches happen on a mobile, often urgently. Click-to-call and directions are always one tap away.
A page per practice area, structured properly, so you rank for the matters you actually want — not the ones you don’t.
Legal web design fails in predictable ways. These are the decisions that separate a site that gets read from one that gets closed.
A client choosing a lawyer is making one of the more consequential decisions of their year, frequently under stress. Everything on the site — the photography, the typography, the clarity of the writing — is either building confidence or quietly draining it.
Firms that list eight practice areas on a single page rank for none of them. A proper page for each, written for the person searching that specific problem, is the single highest-return structural decision in legal web design.
People hesitate to contact a lawyer because they do not know what it commits them to, or what it costs. Stating plainly what a first consultation involves removes the most common reason a visitor closes the tab.
Aggressive pop-ups, countdown timers and chat bots that demand a phone number read as desperate in this profession. Restraint converts better here than urgency does.
Your practice areas, the matters you want more of, and the clients you would rather not attract.
A written scope, a fixed fee, and a launch date, agreed before any work begins.
Drafted copy for review, real screens early, and revision rounds scheduled into the timeline.
Live, indexed, and every account transferred into the firm’s name.
Yes. I draft every page from our conversation and from your existing materials, then you review and correct it — nothing is published without a lawyer at your firm signing off. You know the jurisdictional nuances and the compliance limits far better than I do, and the review step is where those get applied.
I build the site so that required disclaimers, jurisdiction statements and any prescribed language sit where they need to sit, and I will flag anything in a draft that looks like it needs a second look. The compliance judgement itself stays with your firm — I am a designer, not your regulator, and I will not pretend otherwise.
Yes, and for most firms it is worth doing. That can be a discreet request form that lands in your inbox, or a live calendar connected to your practice management or Calendly, depending on whether you want appointments confirmed automatically or screened first.
Not if it is handled properly. Existing URLs are mapped and redirected, page structure and metadata are carried over deliberately, and the technical foundations usually end up better than they were. Rankings are protected by planning the migration, not by leaving a dated site alone.
Quoted per project as a fixed fee against a written scope, agreed before any work starts. A solo practitioner’s site and a twelve-lawyer firm with eight practice areas are genuinely different builds, so a headline price would be misleading. You get one number in writing, and it does not change unless you ask for something additional.
Tell me about your practice — the areas you work in, the matters you want more of, and what your current site is failing to do. You will receive a considered reply with an approach, a timeline and a fixed fee.